Tuesday, September 15, 2015

Today, Not Tomorrow

"What you do today can improve all your tomorrows" - Ralph Marston


I once read a book on handling anger.  One of the activities was to remember the event that caused the anger and to re-live it over and over again, each time trying to see the event as an outsider, not a participant.  Each time, the goal of the drill was to alter our feelings a little more by overpowering our memory.  As humans, we have the ability to create memories and use them to our advantage.  We also have the ability to use the memories to create a seemingly insurmountable disadvantage.  Dave Tate, the founder of EliteFTS, talks about how our minds cause a lot of our lifting problems because we condition ourselves to miss at the same point of a lift.  In a similar way, our attempts at changing to healthy eating can be hindered by what we believe about ourselves.

I've talked with family members, friends, and clients that were all looking to change their eating and the vast majority tell me "I've tried eating healthier, but I just keep messing up."  I've worked with athletes that won't even make attempts because "I always miss."  These statements are the ones that drive me crazy; the future action and potential success is controlled by our memory of a passed event.  Our memories don't have to be an angry memory, a failed memory, or a celebratory memory, they just have to be "memories."  And if we can de-personalize the memory with practice, we can put it to work for us, especially in the gym and in the kitchen.

It seems hard, and it will take some practice, but each day, reflect on how your journey went today.  Every time you encounter a bad memory, look at it as an outsider (not Uncle Bill that thinks dieting is crazy or your mom that thinks you lift too much) that knows how to accomplish your goal.  Use those eyes to detach yourself and acknowledge what you can do better.  And then when you wake up the next day, make that action happen.  I do this in about five minutes before bedtime.  It's that fast to walk through a day as it pertains to health and fitness, and really, it could even be done in a commercial break.

We've all heard the sayings about the past, present, and future, but really, none of us "forgets."  With practice, we can take a potentially damaging memory and just make it a memory.  Doing something today to improve tomorrow isn't just forgetting the "bad" things, it is maintaining good memories of things we've done right, correcting the actions we know we can fix using other's eyes, and giving ourselves a clean slate when things go horribly wrong.  We fight enough battles to change our habits; we don't need to fight our memories as well.

Give it a try tonight...better yet, do it right now.  Reflect back to yesterday and if there is something you don't like, push away from it, see it from the outside, visualize the right action, and put it in the game.  It's going to take practice, but trust me, it will be worth it.

Saturday, August 29, 2015

Handling Failure

We all have bad training or nutrition days. As Dan John said, "Of five workouts, one will be great, one will suck, and three will be right in the middle." How we react to them can be the difference between progress, standing still, or going backward. I've previously talked about confidence being part of the solution and false-confidence being part of the problem, but this goes beyond that. We can be well within our confidence range and have everything go wrong. Even the most confident of us can go into a little tailspin as a result. Today was that day for me and inspired me to write about the process I go through.

With my experience as an athlete and in training, I have seen my share of bad days, whether it's missed sessions, missed reps, or just flat out misses. I've had perfect plans, prepped to the plan, and still seen failure. There are really only a few paths that can be taken after a really bad day, and which ones your choose can make all the difference. It may seem like this only applies to training, but I can assure you, it also applies to nutrition and dieting. Think of the days or weekends where you take an unscheduled detour from your nutrition plan. It happens, even to the most diligent tracker; you go out to eat, there's a family gathering, you forgot your meals. You can ignore what happened, evaluate and continue, evaluate and adjust, let it get you down and blame everything, or let it get you down and quit. In any case, our suggestion will always be the same; don't beat yourself up over it and don't try to compensate without taking the time to think it through. We prefer that, just like training, you acknowledge and evaluate what happened.

Yes, you can completely ignore your failures and possibly have the same avoidable slip-up happen. Or, you can take a few seconds and evaluate what happened, why it happened and decide it's 100% OK. I'm not advocating perfection, but I am promoting self-awareness. Whether you want to be strict, choose to allow detours, or decide it's too much at the moment is up to you, but you have to be aware of what is happening and why before you can make a conscious decision.

  • Ignore that it happened. Basically just shake it off, think nothing of it and continue. This is the same as putting on blinders where somebody else loads the bar for you; ignorance is bliss. Having that short-term memory loss is great when you're still in the training session or competition, but  that's it. If you are ignoring how a training session went, it's probably one of the reasons you're experiencing failures or stalling. In order to improve and not plateau or regress, it is important to have an understanding of why the day was bad and what caused it. This means taking off the blinders and being actively involved in improving. For me, this is an in-session only option, and even then, it is rare.
  • Evaluate the plan and the failure. If my workout was less than great, I will end up here at some point. Sometimes it comes after the self-loathing, anger, and disappointment, but in the end I always come back to evaluating. Once I have the chance to relax and look at the plan, the failure, and the circumstances, I have one of two paths. 
    • Decide it is viable and continue. This is where logs are great and can really help open your eyes to the progress. When something goes wrong, like the reps are slower than they should be or I barely miss a lift, I look at the events that led up to the training session. Did I sleep well? Did I not eat enough? Did I burn out a supporting muscle group the day before? Have I seen improvements in ANY part of my training? Will a deload help? If any of those is a yes, chances are, it isn't the plan and I continue on knowing that the plan will be a success.
    • Decide it won't work and make adjustments. This is a hard one because you have to honestly know your capabilities and use them to evaluate the plan. Could you have made the weight, even on a near-perfect day? Are you going to have "better" days where you are more rested, prepared and can complete the training as written? Am I stalling in other places? Can a deload fix it? If the answer is "No" or "Probably not", then something needs to be adjusted. Constantly having failures in your training is draining, both mentally and physically, and will most likely lead to stalling or backsliding. There is no shame in admitting the time isn't right to run a program or the intensity is too great and needing to back it down. Sometimes the best progress comes from taking a step back so you can get momentum.
  • Feel disheartened, blame yourself, the program, or the trainer. Every now and again, all the stress catches up and I end up here briefly. It's common to get frustrated when things are going well and then a bad failure happens. In this state, there are three paths.
    • Acknowledge that this isn't helping and take a step back and return to evaluating instead of living in woe-is-me.
    • Program / trainer hop. I see this most commonly with newer trainees. When you haven't experienced success following a failure, it is a huge challenge to overcome. You question the program, the trainer, and you might even believe the grass is greener. Even when you have had positive experiences, it can be a challenge to slow the thoughts down and rationally evaluate after an ego-crushing failure. This goes back to having confidence. The self-confidence to know it isn't the end of the world and that if you can just pull it together and take the deep breath, you'll be able to step back and return to evaluating. Sometimes the answer is change programs, but you won't know if you don't go back and evaluate.
    • Quit. We're not even going here because this is not an option. At this point it doesn't matter who takes the blame, there can be no progress when you quit.
We all have less than perfect days and how we handle them will dictate our level of success. The only sure way to find success is to evaluate honestly and choose the right path. Many people turn to external motivation and communities to keep them going, but when the details are ignored, the result may be akin to banging your head on the same wall. Take a moment, acknowledge, evaluate, and decide...and get back to making progress.

Thursday, August 20, 2015

Are You Confident or Just Convincing Yourself You Are?

Confidence - A feeling of self-assurance arising from one's appreciation of one's own abilities or qualities
There is a thin line between displaying false confidence to cover insecurities and demonstrating confidence. More often than not, if it is loud and boisterous it is because of the former. Confidence will get you through challenging situations; false confidence can help you tackle new challenges or it might put you in an even worse predicament. Progress comes from a delicate balance of faked and real confidence. Unless you don't have any social media, you were bound to see the Ronda Rousey / Bethe Correia meme with Correia screaming in the face of Rousey at weigh-ins. As many pointed out, "Confidence is silent. Insecurities are loud." Rousey was confident in her abilities and proceeded to finish the "fight" in 34 seconds.

As an athlete and a coach, I have witnessed confidence in action and the false confidence train wreck. I've been on both sides as a player and as a coach. Now as a Personal Trainer, I see it on a daily basis. It's easy to fall into the trap; it's all over Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Tumblr, and other social networks with a fitness twist. There's a verbal diarrhea of words, Ronnie Coleman and CT Fletcher sayings, and Fitspo meant to pump you up. If you have no idea what I'm talking about, it won't be hard to find examples. You're going to go "Beastmode" on the meal prep, "HAM" on the squats, be a "monster" on the bench, and train like an "animal." While things are going well or you're just training to get better, these sayings may be great, keeping you going and pushing you to focus even harder on your journey. And there is nothing wrong with using a little talk to create motivation. However, when you rely on the false confidence and never back it up with accomplishment and experience, disaster is only a stumble away.

Some of you that use these terms and sayings think I'm just being melodramatic or "hating" on you, but let me run you through a scenario I see on Fitocracy at least three times each week.
You're new to training and eating healthy and you're pumped! You want to emulate all the people that have inspired you, so you buy all the Tupperware, the scale, gym bag, wraps, straps, belt, and sleeves and you're ready to go. You start with the talk, the tagging because that's what you're surrounded by. The "confidence" grows bigger just by talking, but it hasn't even been a week. You start the program and you're on point for the first week or two, maybe even a month. And then, you get punched in the mouth by something, whether it's a "cheat weekend", a holiday, or your first injury. As Mike Tyson said, "Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth." Now you're reeling, you don't know what to do because you've never been knocked down on this journey and all that "confidence" you built by talking big is shaken. You're embarrassed because you look bad. All the big talk and the pumping up is now spiraling the other way. You're caught in the flood of negativity and harsh self-judgment and you don't know if you can get back on the horse.

The only thing that could help is falling back on your experience overcoming obstacles, but do you really have the experience to fall on? Have you done this long enough to recover from this challenge? What happens if you don't have the experience behind the boasts? What if you are a beginner? What if it was all hot air?

You can fall back on your friends and the community support to re-inflate your confidence. You can watch some inspirational videos and stare at some fitspo to help you forget the failure. You can attempt to pump yourself back up with those same terms that let you down before. You have a few options, but in the end, it all comes back to you and your mental toughness. Whether you are a beginner or you have some experience, you need to earn your confidence through more experience. If you always rely on the confidence you haven't earned, it will let you down. Just like if you get it stuck in your mind that you will fail, you are bound to fail. You need to have a foundation and balance.

Because of my experience always being the smallest person in my lifting group, I spent a lot of time watching, learning, and listening. The experience developed some basic tenets that have helped me continue to make progress even after reality pointed out I wasn't an "animal" going "beastmode."
  1. Be confident, but be humble. Much like the true alpha, a truly confident person does not need to have loud talk; they're actions will speak volumes.
  2. If you use false confidence to build yourself up, be sure to back it up so you can turn the experience into real confidence. It might not be today or tomorrow, but it has to happen.
  3. Acknowledge your successes and failures and then build off of them. See failure as an opportunity to have a new success. See success as a stepping stone to greater success.
  4. Know your strengths and weaknesses and be wise enough to ask for help when you are having a moment of weakness.
  5. Be realistic about your progress and your next step. Getting cocky can lead to bad choices and more setbacks. Don't mistake luck for accomplishment.
It's easy to get caught in the moment and want to join in with the crowd, emulating what we see everywhere, but none of us wants to be the 34-second knockout. We're all bound to trip up and get smacked in the face by a reality punch every now and then. How we prepare for the punch and how we react after can be the difference between success and failure. If you work hard, stay humbly confident, and replace your false confidence with the confidence earned through experience you can be successful in changing your life.

Sunday, August 9, 2015

The Lunchbox

It isn't often that watching a 15 minute speech given by a strongman / powerlifter can inspire me in more than lifting. Similarly, it rarely happens that I tell people they need to go and watch the same presentation because of how powerful the message is about our lives. About a month ago, it happened, the rare message that made me think about training, nutrition, and life from a different viewpoint.

"Fill your lunchbox with something you love" - Clint Darden

If you haven't seen Clint Darden's presentations from the PLEXP2, you need to take 15 minutes and watch it (here's the youtube). I truly believe his 15-minute presentation could be the best 15 minutes you spend on the internet this week.

I could make this all about my lunchbox, but you really aren't here to hear me tell you about life. You're here because we have one big thing in common. Fitness.

Your fitness plan shouldn't be worse for you than being un-fit

How many times have you heard somebody talk about their new "diet" or their training program and it sounds like it's so miserable that even they don't enjoy it?  I seem to come across this at least once a week where somebody wants to make a change for the better proceeds to make radical changes which are so different than what they're used to they have no choice but to be miserable.  Creating a newer, healthier lifestyle doesn't have to happen all at once and it doesn't have to be monotonous and miserable.  In fact, we're far more likely to stick with the changes if they aren't boring and miserable. AND THIS IS THE KEY; find a plan you enjoy and you can stick with.
Why? Because we are learning more every day about how the mind can be the most powerful force in our routine. From the placebo effect all the way to general well-being, our mind has control and when we don't enjoy something, everything else seems to go downhill.

For example, I spoke with a lady the other day that was convinced she needed to give up her long runs and do HIIT training in order to burn fat.   While HIIT is effective, eliminating long runs had several negative effects for her.  By completely taking away something she loved and replacing it with something she didn't, it was mentally draining.  Instead of becoming healthier, her diet went astray, she became disenthused, and began missing sessions. The "all in" mentality she had with distance running was gone and replaced with an "eh." While the HIIT may be good for her, taking away everything she enjoyed was not.

The same applies to diets. Making massive changes to your eating style or your diet is likely to lead to non-compliance. Eliminating foods in one cold-turkey move can lead to cravings and for some people, sleep-eating. Changing your meal timing can have a similar effect. Any time you change how you eat, you expect changes in hunger, changes in energy, and moments of weakness. While most diet books and plans can tell you how to eat once you're on their plan, very few give you ideas about how to transition into the new style.

It's about loving what you're doing


So, if you want this journey to be fruitful and last you deep into old age, look back to Clint Darden's presentation and its relevance to health and fitness -- we all want to be the best we can be and while we should be "all in," "be the tortoise," transition slowly, and keep a little something you love in your lunchbox.

Monday, June 29, 2015

Measuring Progress with Repetition Maxes and Indicator Lifts

The other day I received a message from a new strength client asking about testing strength since my style of programming rarely, if ever, calls for one rep maxes. He was quite confused as to how I could guarantee he was getting stronger if he didn't test his maximal strength every few weeks. As a newer lifter, he was seeing quick gains in strength as his body adapted and he wanted the undeniable feedback of pushing a one rep max every few weeks. I understood his concerns because I made the same mistakes before I knew any better, before I really understood Personal Records (PR's). There's a secret in strength training that isn't very secret; strength doesn't come from a one rep max. Strength comes from the accumulation of our efforts and there are many ways to demonstrate the gains we make.

I understand the desire to say "I squat xxx" or "I bench yyy" and I know the high you get from nailing a new PR, limiting progress with the idea that increases in maximal strength progress comes only from a one rep max is erroneous thinking. Simply, one rep max tests take a lot out of the body, can be dangerous without proper spotters, and can actually hinder progress if done too often. At minimum, I have 12 weeks of training before scheduling a test week. If I can move a weight faster, if I can do more reps, if the weight feels lighter, or if I can recover faster, I have demonstrated increased strength expect some impact in my 1 RM as well. More and more people are catching on to the idea that a PR is a PR, whether it's a 5 RM, a 3 RM, or a 1 RM. Strength isn't just one all out effort, but is defined by how we use it. Think of a mover; they may not have a tremendous squat max, but they can run up and down stairs with furniture all day long. Or consider a warehouse employee that is shifting, lifting, and moving boxes eight hours a day. We would all agree they are strong, but their 1 RM means nothing.

Instead of programming one rep max tests during cycles, I use two elements to measure progress and strength gains with my clients and myself. The first element is the repetition max. The second element is an indicator lift.  The combination of rep maxes and indicator lifts provides valuable information about your training, your progress, and ultimately, your strength. Because both of these occur over time, a good workout log is essential in recognizing the changes.

Repetition Maxes - By now, most people understand rep maxes. Briefly, a rep max can be either the most weight you can do for a set number of reps (2, 3, 5, etc.) or it can be a weight done as many times as possible. The first option is primarily used by self-regulating programs that allow you to push as hard as you can for that training session as long as you don't miss. The second option is seen in programs like Jim Wendler's 5/3/1 series. Either version can indicate strength increases. Think about it for a minute; if you benched 225 pounds for 6 and then a month later later hit 225 pounds for 8, you got stronger! Or maybe you're doing 3 sets of 5 and last month you did it with 315 but this month you just did it with 340. You'd agree you got stronger, wouldn't you? And if you want to relate back to a one rep max, it can be done. With repetition maxes of eight or fewer, we can estimate our 1 RM using a simple formula: weight x reps x .0333 + weight. Example:  225 x 5 x .0333 + 225 estimates a 265 pound max.

Indicator Lifts - These take some experience to identify, but everybody has them for each major lift. An indicator lift is another lift that correlates to your "tested" movement. Sometimes they are trained in place of the actual lift or they are done as the first assistance lift. The indicator lift uses many of the same muscles as the main lift, which is why the two are related. For me, when my Incline Bench increases, so does my Flat Bench. For some, it may be Front Squat indicating Squat increase. Whether you are aware of it or not, we all have them. This is where the workout log is so important. The longer you have been training, the easier they are to find. Go back and look at how you were training when you were getting stronger. Find the assistance lift that you were doing that also got stronger. That's your indicator. If you're newer to lifting, this may be harder, but it certainly is possible as long as you keep records of everything.

So if you find yourself always testing your one rep max and never making progress, maybe it's time to step back from test mode and start looking at other PR's using the rep max and indicator lift method of analyzing your strength gains. Your body will thank you for it and I'm willing to bet that you will see more from it in the long run.

Thursday, June 25, 2015

The 1,200 Calorie Myth

The other day I encountered another poor soul led to believe that she must eat 1,200 calories per day in order to lose weight. After explaining why she was incorrect and how she'd been misled by the internet, I decided it was time to see how many cases actually line up with 1,200 calorie diets. Before I dive into the math behind this, I freely admit there are exceptions to every rule in fitness. The odds of someone being one of the exceptions is very small.

Weight loss can be simplified to a single statement, "eat fewer calories than you burn." Whether you perform exercise to raise your caloric burn level or you reduce your intake, weight loss occurs at a deficit. The bad news is that too big of a deficit results in muscle loss, hormonal damage, and metabolic slowdown. The end result is making weight loss harder. There are always exceptions in health and fitness, but chances are, needing 1,200 calories to lose weight isn't because of their body, but because of what they have done to their body.

It is suggested that the caloric deficit not exceed 500 calories below maintenance. Under the assumption that one must eat 1,200 calories to lose weight, that would mean the number of calories needed for maintenance is 1,200 + 500 = 1,700. With the simple multipliers used to convert RMR into TDEE, we can determine the corresponding RMR's.  The following table displays the five measures of activity along with the corresponding RMR that matches a TDEE of 1,700.

ActivityMultiplierCalories
Sedentary1.21,417
Light1.31,308
Moderate1.551,097
Heavy1.6251,046
Very Heavy1.9895

This simple analysis gives us two cases where 1,200 calories is below RMR. This is exquisitely bad over a long period of time as it is typically not sustainable, slows metabolism, slows growth and repair of tissue, and negatively effects hormone levels. The remaining three demonstrate an RMR highly unlikely to be found by anybody working out at the required level to reach a TDEE of 1,700.

In order to test large amounts of hypothetical data, I created a program to calculate RMR and BMI based on a set of conditions. The program was run with the following limitations:

Age: 18 - 64
Height: 4'11" - 6'0"
Weight: 103 -250 pounds

The test program reported no instances of a sub 1000 calorie RMR that would not be considered "Underweight." Further, of the 97,384 potential combinations based on the restrictions, there are 8% (7,703) cases of RMR between 1,000 and 1,200, with approximately 2% having a BMI classified as "Overweight" and .05% considered "Obese." Of those 2,030 cases, all of them are under 5'4" and older than 34 with the "Obese" starting at age 54. The lightest bodyweight meeting these qualifications is 129 pounds for a 4'11", 34 year old ranging up to a 146 pound, 5'4", 64 year old. If we look at RMR from each factor, RMR decreases with age and increases with weight. As weight typically increases with height, it can be seen that as height increases, so does RMR.

Again, the chances that the average female looking to lose weight falls into "1,200 calorie diet" are very slim.

As the calculations found, there are some exceptions to the "1,200 calories is not for you" rule, but chances are you aren't one of them. One exception is the person that has already damaged their metabolism by chronically under-eating. This metabolic slowdown may result in needing to eat 1,200 calories, but through proper diet, this can be reversed back to a more sustainable level. Another exception would be someone on a prescription medicine that impairs metabolic rate. The only other exception I will mention is under the direct care of a medical professional and they will have very specific reasons and guidelines for using the 1,200 calorie diet.

How Can I See Where I Am?

First, we need to find our RMR. From there, we can find our TDEE. Many calculators refer to BMR which is a very strict hospital monitored  measurement of the RMR and is typically slightly lower than RMR formulas estimate. In my opinion, BMR is not relevant unless you literally sit in bed and do absolutely nothing all day. While no formula is perfect for everybody, there are two that have the best RMR predictions for the largest population. Mifflin-St Jeor is the most recent formula developed and demonstrated a greater accuracy than previous formulas. Harris-Benedict is the second formula and is still used by many of the online calculators. In order to calculate the TDEE, the RMR is multiplied by an activity quotient. You can use the Z Strength Calculator to determine your RMR and TDEE and save yourself some time.

Now that we know our minimum (RMR) and maintenance (TDEE), we can create our deficit. The deficit should not force you below your RMR and should be no more than 500 calories below TDEE. I'm willing to bet fewer than five people reading this will calculate 1,200 calories as an appropriate deficit and remain above their RMR. In a perfect world, we would increase the space between our RMR and our TDEE by increasing activity, allowing us to lose weight while eating the most calories possible.

Again, if we eat too far below our TDEE, we risk slowing our metabolism, making it harder to lose weight. When this happens, the standard response is either a) eat less or b) be more active. Both options create a bigger deficit forcing the body to slow metabolism further. Remember, the human body has learned to survive over thousands of years and it will compensate to survive.

Regarding the Program Used to Gather Data

Using the limitations, the program calculated more than 97,000 combinations, finding fewer than 8,000 that resulted in an RMR of 1,200 or lower. In an attempt to relate these numbers to a common factor, it also calculated the BMI (Body Mass Index) for each of the combinations. The majority of these combinations resulted in a BMI below 22, which is well within the "Normal" range. While many of us agree BMI is a bad tool because more muscular people rank as "Overweight" or "Obese", it is a useful tool for the less muscular developing weight loss goals.

Friday, June 19, 2015

Not All Free Information is Good Information

Seems like an obvious statement, but for the fitness newcomer there is so much information out there that it's hard to decipher what's good and what's guru. Over the last few weeks, I have read, heard, and seen some terrible advice given to fitness novices as they try to learn about training, develop technique, and improve themselves. I'm not talking about "bad information" that says there is only one way to build arms. I'm talking about legitimately dangerous information. Some bad information comes from forums, some from the local broscientist at the gym, and some from well-meaning but ill-informed novices that perpetuate myths. Regardless of where it originates, somebody without knowledge or a bs-o-meter for fitness is at risk.

I won't be the first to say it, but there is more than one way to accomplish any fitness related goal, and while the paths may be more or less efficient, given the correct information, they will lead to the ultimate goal. So, the goal of this post is to help you learn to identify good and useful information while discarding (and maybe even battling) the bad information while increasing your own knowledge. I'm not talking about controversial or less than optimal information; I'm talking about blatantly wrong information.
As an example, a gentleman is seeking advice on his deadlift technique, so he posts a video to be checked. Despite glaring technique issues, he gets the thumbs up and a host of "attaboys" just because he pulled more weight than the people watching the video.
 Another example is a lady asking a diet / nutrition based question as she has not been able to lose weight for several months despite her high 4 days of activity and her low calorie diet. Instead of relevant and educated responses, she receives "cut your calories" and "add HIIT to your training" as advice.
These ignorant responses lead people into potentially dangerous situations where they risk injury or other health problems. With more and more people turning to forums for advice, form checks, programming and nutrition advice, it's hard to know who is and who isn't giving you qualified advice.

Some of you may be wondering what's wrong with the answers. In the first example, a knowledgeable lifter sees poor technique despite the made lift and provides critical feedback while others convince the lifter he's doing it right. If the poster chooses to accept the compliments of the masses over the criticisms, he runs the risk of injury as the weight increases. With the second case, the lady is already under-eating for her activity levels. If she chose to follow the standard advice of "eat less, do more," she will most definitely tank her metabolism, which we all know is worse than gaining a few pounds over time to improve her metabolism.

While forums and social media provide us fast access to free advice, the fast and free advice can also be one of the worst parts. Before the explosion of fitness forums, you had to know somebody, pay somebody, or spend hours experiencing in order to find the answer to fitness questions. Because the community was so small, it was easy to identify who was providing legitimate information and who was not. With large internet forums and the "community" of social networks, Brosef is now out in full force, providing information read in some rag, heard in some rumor mill, or picked up at a Holiday Inn Express. This isn't to say all information in these forums are bad, but being able to sniff out crap makes them much more useful.

This brings me to the heart of this post, identifying good information versus bad information and how to filter what you need. Some will say only coaches and certified trainers should be giving advice. I've even seen a person claim you should listen to them solely because they are "certified." Bull! I've seen my fair share of ignorant coaches and certified trainers giving bad advice online and doing stupid stuff in the gym. The certificate doesn't mean you're good; it means you passed a test. I learned more from training with non-certified people that had years of experience than I did by reading the book for the CPT test.

The first rule, and this one trumps them all, if they demand you listen to them because of their piece of paper, move along to somebody with less fake alpha-ness.  The truly knowledgeable will always put the information out there with their rationale when the fakers just tell you to do it and resort to some form of "because I said."

If the information giver passes the first test, there are a few more steps you can use to sort the useful from the bad:
  1. Know who and where you're getting advice from.
    • Experience is king, everything else is second (certifications, degrees, staying at a Holiday Inn Express).
    • Check the content on the site you're using. If a site caters to bodybuilding, asking questions about triathlons may result in horrible information.
    • If you're on a site related to infomercial products (Beach Body, the Wraps, Detoxes), find at least 2 more sites with no ties to those products before accepting the information.
  2. Ask yourself if the answer makes sense.
    • If you're doing an exercise and it hurts but somebody is telling you it's perfect form, clearly, it's not perfect.
    • If you already exercise hard and don't eat a lot but aren't losing weight, it makes no sense to eat less and train more.
    • If the answer applies to a different situation than yours, disregard the response because they couldn't even take the time to answer your specific question.
  3. Research your question and whatever answers you're considering for some form of consensus before accepting the advice.
    • If you're looking for technique, there are a lot of youtube videos out there for instruction of movements.  Video yourself and compare the two. If you're computer savvy, you can use kinovea to do side by side analysis.
    • If you're looking for programming or diet advice, stay away from popular mags (Men's Health, Women's Health, Oxygen, etc) because while they may provide some good information, often times they provide partial solutions.
    • If the article is trying to sell you a product, re-read the article without the product. If the answer still makes sense, use it, if not, move along.
The next time you're looking for fitness advice, take a moment to analyze what you're seeing, reading, and hearing. Consider asking for resources to help you learn because while it's easy to just ask and accept, it is far better to learn and know. Anybody giving solid advice will be more than happy to point you in the right direction.

To your education!